[Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#1124549: Processed: retitle 1124549 to libvirt passes invalid flags for network interface deletion ..., tagging 1124549

[Ben Hutchings]

On Sat, 2026-02-21 at 12:15 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 05:49:02PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > reassign 1124549 libvirt 7.0.0-3+deb11u3
> > Bug #1124549 [src:linux] libvirt passes invalid flags for network interface deletion
> > Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux' to 'libvirt'.
> > No longer marked as found in versions linux/5.10.247-1.
> > Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1124549 to the same values previously set
> > Bug #1124549 [libvirt] libvirt passes invalid flags for network interface deletion
> > There is no source info for the package 'libvirt' at version '7.0.0-3+deb11u3' with architecture ''
> > Unable to make a source version for version '7.0.0-3+deb11u3'
> > Marked as found in versions 7.0.0-3+deb11u3.
> 
> Ben,
> 
> based on the fact that you reassigned the bug to libvirt, I
> understand that you are not going to address this in the kernel. Is
> that correct?

Correct.

> To be honest I'm not particularly interested in pursuing updates to
> oldoldstable, especially considering that it'll be out of LTS support
> in just a few months.
> 
> Does anyone know if there's a way to flag the LTS folks so that they
> will take a look and consider whether to take a bug on? Otherwise I'd
> be inclined to just close this and invite users affected by the issue
> to move to a supported release.

I or another member of the LTS team will take care of this.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings - Debian developer, member of kernel, installer and LTS
teams
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-libvirt-maintainers/attachments/20260221/225167e2/attachment-0001.sig>