Concerning Clang 3.3 and the massive trail of GCC add-ons
Marc Driftmeyer
mjd at reanimality.com
Wed Apr 17 00:10:01 UTC 2013
Firstly,
Thanks for packaging this. It saves time in my life and I truly
appreciate the effort, though I must confess to having a localized
/usr/local copy of compiler-rt, clang, llvm, libcxxabi, libc++,
test-suite, clang extra built nightly on my dev system.
My question concerns the GCC baggage:
$ sudo apt-get -t experimental install clang-3.3
The following packages will be REMOVED:
compiler-rt
The following NEW packages will be installed:
clang-3.3 cpp-4.8 gcc-4.8 gcc-4.8-base libasan0 libatomic1
libcloog-ppl1 libgcc-4.7-dev libgcc-4.8-dev
libgfortran-4.7-dev libobjc-4.7-dev libtsan0 llvm-3.3 llvm-3.3-dev
llvm-3.3-runtime
The following packages will be upgraded:
cpp-4.7 fixincludes g++-4.7 gcc-4.7 gcc-4.7-base gcc-4.7-plugin-dev
gfortran-4.7 gobjc++-4.7 gobjc-4.7
libgcc1 libgfortran3 libgomp1 libitm1 libmudflap0 libmudflap0-4.7-dev
libobjc4 libquadmath0 libstdc++6
libstdc++6-4.7-dev
19 upgraded, 15 newly installed, 1 to remove and 174 not upgraded.
Need to get 87.7 MB of archives.
After this operation, 130 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? n
I understand and expect when a latest compiler-rt against trunk you
choose to build against arrives that removal will not exist.
I don't grasp the need for all the gcc-4.8 and gcc-4.7 baggage seeing as
the only need for gcc is to build a first copy of llvm/clang and from
there it self-hosts.
What is the point of all this extra that I have zero use for from
Experimental? I've got gcc-4.7.2 from Sid installed and that's all one
needs.
Clarification would be appreciated,
Sincerely,
Marc J. Driftmeyer
More information about the Pkg-llvm-team
mailing list