Bug#693208: Bug#699899: tpu: clang/3.0-6.1+deb7u0

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 22:28 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" <adam at adam-barratt.org.uk> writes:
> > What's the status of getting this fixed in unstable, as already
> > requested by Julien in #693208?
> Why is it necessary to fix this in unstable? This’d require introducing
> an epoch. Let me know if you insist on it, but I don’t understand why
> this is important.

I wasn't particularly suggesting re-introducing 3.0 to unstable.
However, given that packages from tpu get essentially no testing at all
(no pun intended) before hitting testing, being able to prove a patch in
unstable first avoids a number of (admittedly not all) potential issues.

Looking at the proposed tpu diff and the 3.0 -> 3.1 diff, it looks like
the armhf changes should apply "as is" to 3.1; has anyone tried that?

Regards,

Adam