Bug#693208: Bug#699899: tpu: clang/3.0-6.1+deb7u0

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 19:29 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le 02/07/13 18:07, Michael Stapelberg a écrit :
>> Update: the armhf build failed because about 100 testcases fail.

Hmm, presumably it worked at some point, given there are armhf binaries
in unstable. :-(

> > Given that the 3.0 version works — it passed all the clang tests and can
> > compile non-trivial software on armhf and amd64 — can we just upload
> > that? Or, as a last resort, re-introduce 3.0 in unstable, even if
> > switching to an epoch is ugly?
> >
> Don't bother too much about the epoch, clang source package is going to
> be removed anyway...

Given that 3.1 appears never to have managed to build on several
architectures in unstable (a regression in each case) and that I assume
the intention would be to introduce 3.2 to unstable after the release,
then if Sylvestre's not opposed reintroducing a fixed 3.0 to sid
temporarily may be the sanest answer.

Regards,

Adam