Bug#718637: libc++-dev: improper alternative handling in M-A:same package
Andreas Beckmann
anbe at debian.org
Fri Nov 1 13:40:27 UTC 2013
On 2013-08-20 15:26, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> 0m35.7s ERROR: FAIL: After purging files have disappeared:
>> /etc/alternatives/c++ -> /usr/bin/clang++-libc++ not owned
>> /usr/bin/c++ -> /etc/alternatives/c++ not owned
>
> Any idea how this should be managed ?
Are there any other packages providing /usr/bin/cc, /usr/bin/c++
(shipping files, setting up alternatives, diverting stuff, ...) that
could serve as examples?
The easiest solution I see here is to move /usr/bin/clang++-libc++ and
the c++ alternative to a separate package
Package: c++squared
Arch: all
Multi-Arch: foreign (???)
Depends: libc++-dev, clang++
(btw, can we use g++ with libc++?)
I also don't think it is a good idea to have a
lib(std)?c++(-[-.0-9]+)?-dev
package "manipulate" a compiler.
Andreas
More information about the Pkg-llvm-team
mailing list