Bug#797917: Actually this bug makes clang not so useful
Gianfranco Costamagna
costamagnagianfranco at yahoo.it
Fri Sep 4 09:23:10 UTC 2015
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi Danny,
> If we could make those "Dual-ABI compile flags" the default on
> gcc-compiled libraries, clang upstream should have enough time
> implementing [abi:cxx11] and remain usable in Debian.
gcc had the dual ABI enabled.
but it got disable in the experimental/unstable uploads:
https://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gcc-5/news/20150616T170514Z.html
I guess clang is not useful for cxx11 projects until llvm folks finds
a way to make it use the new ABI.
sorry, but I don't see how to fix this, for sure enabling again the
dual ABI in gcc (not even sure if it will work), is a no-go, because
I'm pretty sure it will trigger another painful transition.
I'm sorry but we should live with this, until llvm folks implemtents
the new code.
Sylvestre, doko, what is your opinion?
cheers,
G.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=L2mz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Pkg-llvm-team
mailing list