Bug#829361: clang-x.y-doc: Fix the lintian error 'privacy-breach-uses-embedded-file' [was: Re: Processed: affects 829361]

Sylvestre Ledru sylvestre at debian.org
Sat Feb 10 08:42:29 UTC 2018


Le 10/02/2018 à 01:08, Nicholas D Steeves a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 11:24:48AM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> On 17/01/2018 16:55, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>>> Le 19/12/2017 à 01:59, Nicholas D Steeves a écrit :
>>>> Hi Sylvestre,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 08:57:39AM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>>>>> Hello
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't hesitate if you need help!
>>>>>
>>>>> S
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the support :-) Would it be alright if I switch to using
>>>> more modern dh sphynxdoc magic, package-doc.install files instead of
>>>> the current d/rules method?  I don't think it will need debhelper 10,
>>>> but I have to look into it some more.
>>>>
>>>> Oh!  One thing that would make this much faster would be knowing how
>>>> to build just the documentation.  Each run is currently very slow,
>>>> because it builds all of llvm-toolchain.
>>>>
>>>> Other than that, please ping me in a month if I haven't yet submitted
>>>> anything.
>>> ping :)
>>>
>>> (almost a month and I saw that in my build :)
>> One more time :)
>>
>> (I wont bother you anymore after this ping)
>>
>> S
>>
> Thank you for pinging me!  Sorry I'm making such slow progress...
>
> Unfortunately debian/rules build_doc doesn't work because the
> build-llvm target dir isn't created for build_doc.  I also tried
> 'make -f debian/rules build_doc'.
>
> I've also recently encountered several different FTBS
> (llvm-toolchain-5.0 building for sid) depending on how I built the
> package.  eg: gbp due to patch fuzz, dpkg-buildpackage inside of a
> chroot due to a failing self-test (log attached.  Identical failure to
> when using pdebuild), sbuild (I'll need to try this one again to catch
> the log)...  I've attached another FTBS log, but I don't remember
> which method I was using to build that one, and I'm particularly
> perplexed where llvm-toolchain-5.0_5.0.1.orig.tar.bz2 came from... It
> was a link to llvm-toolchain-5.0_5.0.1.orig.tar.gz.  I think dget
> generated it.
>
> Should I target a different version of llvm-toolchain?  I'm not sure
> how I can make any progress on this bug with these various FTBS
> issues...

This is caused by a recent change in gold I think.

Just add a ; XFAIL: * at in the test to silent it.

BTW, in the future, please don't attach the full build log:
We just need the error message.


S



More information about the Pkg-llvm-team mailing list