Bug#1073983: transition: ocaml
Adrian Bunk
bunk at debian.org
Tue Jul 16 12:16:54 BST 2024
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 10:25:43AM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Stéphane,
> Le 27/06/2024 à 11:38, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
> > The remaining unknowns are llvm-toolchain-{14,15,16,17,18}... [...]
>
> I've done a rebuild of the OCaml universe with yesterday's unstable
> (mostly). The "missing" packages are the same, but the llvm-toolchain-16
> build got far enough to FTBFS because of OCaml 5.2.0. This is likely to
> affect llvm-toolchain-{14,15} as well, but might be fixed in newer versions.
> I've reported bugs accordingly.
>
> > [...] Worst case scenario: the OCaml bindings can be disabled (they
> > don't have reverse dependencies in Debian).
>
> I still think this is the best course of action.
looking at [1] this might be the only reasonable course of action for LLVM < 17.
> Cheers,
cu
Adrian
[1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/30f423a543641816e367cd17dad3d4808cba8a79
More information about the Pkg-llvm-team
mailing list