[pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

[Adnan Hodzic]

Jonathan,

>> Awhile back I started packaging process. I basically re-packaged the LXD
>> Ubuntu package. As Evgeni mentioned it "is what we did with the other LXC
>> components and that worked out pretty well so far."
>
>Do you have that lying around, and if so is it worth us pushing it to a git
>repo for pkg-lxc?

I think it is, as once golang dependencies are satisfied, we can push it
into Debian.

Let me look in what state I left it in, also I want to update it to the
latest lxd version and I'll push into pkg-lxc git repo. If there are no
objections?

I'll do this this weekend.

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Jonathan Dowland <jmtd at debian.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:35:24AM +0200, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
> > Awhile back I started packaging process. I basically re-packaged the LXD
> > Ubuntu package. As Evgeni mentioned it "is what we did with the other LXC
> > components and that worked out pretty well so far."
>
> Do you have that lying around, and if so is it worth us pushing it to a git
> repo for pkg-lxc?
>
> > At this point, I think we just need to align the efforts between pkg-go
> and
> > pkg-lxc teams, and we'll see LXD in Debian in no time.
>
> I've just joined both teams and opened an ITP for golang-petname. I've got
> a
> package prepared pending a few questions on the pkg-go list, I should get
> it
> into NEW Tomorrow. Then perhaps I can start on the others next week.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Jonathan Dowland
>



-- 
Adnan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-lxc-devel/attachments/20160929/40792393/attachment.html>