[Pkg-lxde-maintainers] Bug#610070: Should it be a recommend/depend?
Klaus Ade Johnstad
klaus at skolelinux.no
Fri Feb 11 10:51:26 UTC 2011
Shouldn't desktop-file-utils be a recommends or depends in one of the
lxde-packages?
--
Klaus Ade
67E61D18B2C44F8A3DA35C6D849F9F5F 26FA477D
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-lxde-maintainers/attachments/20110211/4a149274/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Pkg-lxde-maintainers
mailing list