[Pkg-mailman-hackers] Anybody looking at #242713?

[Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi]

--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Siggy,

On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 06:00:25PM +0200, Siggy Brentrup <bsb@debian.org> w=
rote:
> I don't want to leave RC bugs unanswered; I expect from advanced users
> (only those can file bugs > normal) that they use their brain before
> submitting.  Offering to reopen when missing information is supplied
> seemed TRT[tm] to me.
 ACK. I meant downgrading would have been better, as we are not yet
convienced that's something is there out in the wild. Only beacuse this
way me missed two mails to the bug (when it's closed, b.d.o drops
additional mails). Btw, nevermind.

> Obviously you are a much kinder and more
> patient person than I am. :-)
 Want to make a bet? :) OK, in the process control industry, which is my
primary workplace, I am in the center of operators, directors, techs and
mechanicians -- ranging people in background and education, it's much
better if you can talk with them calmly why their idea is not suitable
or just need arrangement with other parties.

> btw: when python chokes an AttributeError on string.ascii_uppercase,
> there is something seriously broken on the submitter's system.
 It seems _not_ the case. All Python related packages are correctly
installed, md5sums on string.py[co] are correct, and he can run your
mini test of string.ascii_lowercase.

[ ... thanks for your help on b.d.o and attributes ... ]

> > Btw, I will look into #242740, #224319 and #242713 if I can fix
> > them. Also I am intrested about #240601. But if I can't do it on
> > during this weekend, or someone other would like to take them, feel
> > free to do it.
>=20
> Go ahead, this weekend I'd like to devote to learning GNU R, it's been
> a long time that I studied mathematical statistics, nearly everything
> seems to be deeply buried :-(.
 OK, #242740 is still misterious could not look further, #224319 should
be safe now, #242713 has a proposed fix, waiting for your or user's
confirmation (ie needs testing). I haven't check #240601 either. :(

Cheers,
L=E1szl=F3

--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAfG2hMDatjqUaT90RAiLMAJ4phzzSXPcoUR/mLxpPp11PsZSI5gCeONT8
pTg2kxVvwzwdTxORzddnlaw=
=jY0b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA--