[Pkg-mailman-hackers] various issues

[GCS]

On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 01:58:46PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@raw.no> wrote:
> |  I have checked #232599, and it seems to be a debconf problem, so I
> | think it should be closed or reassigned (I am not a Debian Developer, so
> | I guess I can not do it myself).
> 
> You can; just mail $bugnumber-done@bugs.debian.org with a reasonable
> explanation.
 OK, should be done by now.

> |  I attach a hungarian debconf translation - can I check in into the
> | trunk?
> 
> Go ahead.
 Just committed.

> Those are the rules in another project I'm taking part of.  (Slightly
> modified)
 Thanks.

> It's silly to split it too much.  Each language is about 2-300KB.
> However, I don't have a logical grouping for them.  Splitting packages
> for the sake of splitting them is not something we should do.
 I agree by now. A data and a core part would do IMHO.

Is #188020 dealt with? The conclusion was to inform upstream, but it's
still the same after a bit less than a year, and does not have the
'upstream' flag.

Cheers,
GCS