[Pkg-mailman-hackers] Should we support backporting?

[Siggy Brentrup]

--/3yNEOqWowh/8j+e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Hello co-maintainers,

since only Laszlo has subscribed to this list at the time of this
writing, I'm Cc'ing the others and the disfunctional
pkg-mailman-hackers.

Regarding Bug #223348 the question arises wether we should
support backporting to woody.  The submitter supplies a
patch, nevertheless I'm inclined to tag this bug *wontfix*
as long as policy doesn't require backport support.

Opinions?
. Siggy

--/3yNEOqWowh/8j+e
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAYCO894B/SGO8KQcRAnY7AJkB/CutotaPRq5yGjQUfwAnGHKysQCgjkRt
41surEudTueOgW+NufLcyOg=
=9D4H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--/3yNEOqWowh/8j+e--