[Pkg-mailman-hackers] Backporting of mailman 2.1.9-2

Pawel Tecza ptecza at uw.edu.pl
Mon Nov 27 11:20:10 UTC 2006


On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 11:58:07AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 10:51 +0100, Joost van Baal wrote:
> > > So my question is: do I really need newer version of debhelper?
> > > I fixed debian/control and debian/compat files and built
> > > my backport without any errors or warnings.  Do you think
> > > that my changes make sense and there are safe?
> > 
> > IIRC a backported debhelper is available from backports.org.
> 
> Exactly, using that is the best way to deal with this.

Hi Thijs,

I'll use backported debhelper only at a last resort :)

Now I prefer using stable version of debhelper and I hope
it's sufficient.  Of course, I can change my decision,
if you can explain me why I shouldn't use old debhelper
to build my mailman backport :)

My best regards,

Pawel



More information about the Pkg-mailman-hackers mailing list