[Pkg-mailman-hackers] Backporting of mailman 2.1.9-2
Pawel Tecza
ptecza at uw.edu.pl
Mon Nov 27 11:20:10 UTC 2006
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 11:58:07AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 10:51 +0100, Joost van Baal wrote:
> > > So my question is: do I really need newer version of debhelper?
> > > I fixed debian/control and debian/compat files and built
> > > my backport without any errors or warnings. Do you think
> > > that my changes make sense and there are safe?
> >
> > IIRC a backported debhelper is available from backports.org.
>
> Exactly, using that is the best way to deal with this.
Hi Thijs,
I'll use backported debhelper only at a last resort :)
Now I prefer using stable version of debhelper and I hope
it's sufficient. Of course, I can change my decision,
if you can explain me why I shouldn't use old debhelper
to build my mailman backport :)
My best regards,
Pawel
More information about the Pkg-mailman-hackers
mailing list