[Pkg-mailman-hackers] Bug#921128: Bug#921128: Info received (mailman3-web fails to initialize mysql: Specified key was too long)

Jonas Meurer jonas at freesources.org
Thu Feb 14 23:57:29 GMT 2019


Pierre-Elliott Bécue:
> Le lundi 11 février 2019 à 23:40:51+0100, Jonas Meurer a écrit :
>> Hi PEB, hi anarcat,
>>
>> Pierre-Elliott Bécue:
>>> Le lundi 11 février 2019 à 16:27:21-0500, Antoine Beaupré a écrit :
>>>> On 2019-02-11 21:52:32, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
>>>>> Le lundi 11 février 2019 à 09:14:55-0500, Antoine Beaupré a écrit :
>>>>>> Right, the only way this could be properly implemented would be if
>>>>>> debconf would attempt to connect with the configured DB credentials to
>>>>>> check the remote server version (or, better, to test the actuall code
>>>>>> bugginess).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's probably overkill though.
>>>>>
>>>>> ISTM that it is.
>>>>>
>>>>> But if you wish to go to such extents I'd be glad to include a patch!
>>>>> (no time to dev it though)
>>>>
>>>> Alright, let good win in the face of non-existing perfect threats. ;)
>>>
>>> I'll leave ourselves 24h of thinking and then I'll upload.
>>>
>>> If you get attacked by insomnia, you know what to do. :P
>>
>> Sorry for not responding earlier, I was to busy with other things.
>> Still, I should have reacted earlier ...
>>
>> As you might have seen, mariadb-10.1 10.1.37-0+deb9u1 is in stable-new
>> queue[1]. I don't know the details why it didn't proceed to stable yet,
>> but there's hope that this issue will be sorted out in Stretch soon. The
>> 10.1.37 contains both the upstream backport of
>> `innodb_default_row_format`[2] and the patch to the config[3] that sets
>> the default row format to `dynamic`, so the `max key length is 767
>> bytes` error is definitely fixed in this release.
>>
>> Therefore I don't think it's still *needed* to upload the patch that PEB
>> poposed in this bugreport. I don't *object* to uploading it either. So
>> if you want to, go ahead, PEB. But we should track the mariadb 10.1
>> version in Stretch and remove the Debconf question again once mariadb
>> 10.1.37 got accepted into Stretch.
>>
>> Cheers
> 
> This mariadb release seems to be already in security for stretch.
> 
> I changed a little the warning but I think we should keep it (at least
> until the point release of stretch is really done):
> https://salsa.debian.org/mailman-team/mailman-suite/commits/stretch-backports
> 
> Tell me what you think about it.

Thanks for taking care, PEB! As written, I don't have strong feelings on
that, given that a compatible MariaDB should propagate to Stretch soon
(hopefully). Feel free to upload as is, I reviewed the commits and think
they're fine.

I agree with you though that we should remove the debconf notification
again once the compatible MariaDB packages went into Stretch.

Cheers
 jonas

> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-mailman-hackers/attachments/20190215/1139ca55/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pkg-mailman-hackers mailing list