Please bump the upstream version of Marco

[Martin Wimpress]

Hi,

We do have some bug fixes for Marco that could be cherry picked for a new
upstream release. It is my last day of service tomorrow so I'll progress
this upstream and have an answer by Friday.

Regards, Martin.
On 19 Aug 2015 22:49, "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" <
glaubitz at physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:

> On 08/19/2015 10:51 PM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > Please let's not depend on any upstream action here.
> >
> > We can simply upload this marco version as (e.g.)
> > 1.10.1+unmodified-1 (or such) and prepare the next release in Git
> > already (with +unmodified dropped in changelog, watch and rules).
>
> Can we get some little clarification here what actually happened?
>
> Removing the dfsg1 suffix implies that the upstream tarball changed
> from the previous upload which would normally mean that the upstream
> version has to be bumped as otherwise it couldn't have changed.
>
> I assume that version 1.10.1 was already dfsg-clean after all and
> Martin just forgot to remove the suffix for the -1 version in
> experimental? Am I correct?
>
> In any case, I'd still be in favor bumping the upstream version
> as adding such weird suffixes will just confuse users and other
> developers even more. It shouldn't be too difficult to make some
> other useful changes to justify a 1.10.2 release, should it?
>
> Adrian
>
> --
>  .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> : :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz at debian.org
> `. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz at physik.fu-berlin.de
>   `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
>
> _______________________________________________
> pkg-mate-team mailing list
> pkg-mate-team at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mate-team
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mate-team/attachments/20150819/303365b4/attachment.html>