[Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Processing of mozilla-mozgest_2.1.4-1_i386.changes

[Alan Woodland]

2009/9/16 Andrea Veri <andrea.veri89 at gmail.com>:
> Benjamin Drung ha scritto:
>> Am Dienstag, den 15.09.2009, 19:39 +0100 schrieb Alan Woodland:
>>> With the help of Andrea Veri I've just uploaded a new version of
>>> mozilla-mozgest, which now uses mozilla-devscripts and has the
>>> maintainer field set to pkg-mozext-maintainers. Is there anything
>>> important to know about importing it into git? I come from an SVN/CVS
>>> background :)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I worked on the Ubuntu package, too. It's good to hear, that we reduce
>> the diffs between the Debian and Ubuntu package. I have some
>> suggestions:
>>
>> Can you rename the source package from mozilla-mozgest to mozgest?
>
> we will see, it's not the main priority atm.
That's probably a bad idea generally though - the current name
pre-dates pheonix/firebird/firefox/iceweasel naming!
>
>
>> Can you remove "iceweasel (>= 2.0) | icedove (>= 2.0)" from Depends?
>> ${xpi:Depends} does this job.
>
> no, they are needed. xpi:depends does the job for ffox / abrowsers but
> not for iceweasel / icedove.
>
>
>> Please drop MOZ_EXTENSION_PKG, it is set automatically.
>
> will be done on next revision upload.
>
>
>> Are the postinst and postrm scripts required?
>
> I remember yes, but Alan would know more about it for sure.
That depends if the required call to update-iceape-chrome will get
generated automatically by mozilla-devscripts (although iceape support
is broken in the current version anyway I think). I remembered hearing
iceape was changing the extensions system in the not too distant
future anyway though?

Alan