[Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Processing of mozilla-mozgest_2.1.4-1_i386.changes

[Benjamin Drung]

Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 10:47 +0100 schrieb Alan Woodland: 
> >> Can you rename the source package from mozilla-mozgest to mozgest?
> >
> > we will see, it's not the main priority atm.
> 
> That's probably a bad idea generally though - the current name
> pre-dates pheonix/firebird/firefox/iceweasel naming!

Why is this a bad idea? According to
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianMozExtTeam the binary package should
be named xul-ext-mozgest. So why should the source package for
xul-ext-mozgest be mozilla-mozgest? I think the source for xul-ext-$NAME
should be $NAME.

> > Can you remove "iceweasel (>= 2.0) | icedove (>= 2.0)" from Depends?
> > ${xpi:Depends} does this job.
> 
> no, they are needed. xpi:depends does the job for ffox / abrowsers but
> not for iceweasel / icedove.

The "iceweasel (>= 2.0) | icedove (>= 2.0)" causes an empty Recommends.
This is what I get:

xpi:Depends=abrowser-3.0 | abrowser-3.5 | abrowser-3.6 | firefox-3.0 |
firefox-3.5 | firefox-3.6 | iceape | icedove | iceweasel | seamonkey |
thunderbird | thunderbird-3.0

You can see "icedove | iceweasel" in there.

Cheers,
Benjamin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozext-maintainers/attachments/20090916/a3194a68/attachment.pgp>