[Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Processing of mozilla-mozgest_2.1.4-1_i386.changes

[Benjamin Drung]

Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 12:51 +0200 schrieb Andrea Veri:
> Benjamin Drung ha scritto:
> 
> > If you rename the source package, it will need to go through NEW. So you
> > do not have to wait for uploading.
> 
> 
> Alan should give me the ack to rename the source package first.

What is with this answer:

Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 11:34 +0100 schrieb Alan Woodland:
> >> That's probably a bad idea generally though - the current name
> >> pre-dates pheonix/firebird/firefox/iceweasel naming!
> >
> > Why is this a bad idea? According to
> > http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianMozExtTeam the binary package should
> > be named xul-ext-mozgest. So why should the source package for
> > xul-ext-mozgest be mozilla-mozgest? I think the source for xul-ext-$NAME
> > should be $NAME.
> 
> oops, s/bad/good/, I changed that sentence halfway through writing it.
> I am really all in favour of standardised naming!
> 
> Alan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozext-maintainers/attachments/20090916/22f7092a/attachment-0001.pgp>