[Pkg-mozext-maintainers] libxul vs. libxul-embedding
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
dkg at fifthhorseman.net
Wed Apr 14 08:13:49 UTC 2010
On 04/14/2010 03:41 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 03:19:35AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> ah, ok, that's one less confusion for me ;) Will you file it in the
>> appropriate place or should i?
>
> It's already fixed in my local branch. Expect the next xulrunner upload
> to be fixed.
Thanks, Mike!
> Yes, frozen interfaces are the stable ones.
interesting. So if i build something against 1.9.1 that needs to
include header files from unstable, do i need to be linking against
something else then? It looks to me like all the documentation about
the xpcom glue refers strictly to the frozen/stable stuff.
> Please note that there isn't
> a distinction between stable and unstable in xulrunner 1.9.2.
Is that because the APIs are actually stabilizing? Or because they're
all unstable in 1.9.2?
--dkg
More information about the Pkg-mozext-maintainers
mailing list