[Pkg-mozext-maintainers] ITP: xul-ext-dactyl -- keyboard-accessible user interfaces for XUL-based applications
Michael Schutte
michi at debian.org
Mon Jul 25 16:22:06 UTC 2011
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 05:50:50PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Montag, den 25.07.2011, 17:48 +0200 schrieb Michael Schutte:
> > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 06:56:40PM +0200, Michael Schutte wrote:
> > > The main issue is this: By default, upstream moves most of the XPI
> > > file’s content into a subdirectory whose name is dynamically computed
> > > from the build time, apparently “to foil the fastload cache on upgrade”.
> > > I’d rather not have different paths for every build of the exact same
> > > package, so I’ve decided on using a revision-based directory name
> > > instead. Do you have an idea whether this is needed at all when dealing
> > > with system-wide extensions?
> >
> > Any comments on that? If not, I’d like to get the package into NEW.
>
> About which directory are you talking? Can you give an example?
/usr/share/xul-ext/pentadactyl/1_0_b6_1/ in the binary package; its name
is determined by $(MANGLE) in common/Makefile. I think this is rather
ugly and would like to get rid of it if possible, but I suppose upstream
has introduced it for a reason …
Cheers,
--
Michael Schutte | michi@{uiae.at,debian.org}
Innsbruck, Austria | happily accepting encrypted mail
OpenPGP: 0x16fb 517b a866 c3f6 8f11 1485 f3e4 122f 1D8C 261A
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozext-maintainers/attachments/20110725/25b229d1/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Pkg-mozext-maintainers
mailing list