From dilinger at queued.net Fri Apr 3 19:18:38 2026 From: dilinger at queued.net (Andres Salomon) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2026 14:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#1102005: webext-ublock-origin-chromium: No longer supported by latest chromium :( In-Reply-To: <52402da1f0f8c58365972b1b3199e7d39871e1a5.camel@debian.org> References: <52402da1f0f8c58365972b1b3199e7d39871e1a5.camel@debian.org> <52402da1f0f8c58365972b1b3199e7d39871e1a5.camel@debian.org> Message-ID: <75f411ce-4506-4784-817c-ee6980d282ba@queued.net> On Sun, 02 Nov 2025 17:46:42 +0100 Markus Koschany wrote: > Control: severity -1 important > > I'm using the same Chromium version on bookworm and for me the workaround still > works. I haven't looked into ubo-lite yet but it appears to be the only > supported version for the long-run, with less functionality though. Not sure if > it makes sense to include it in ublock-origin or if a new source package is > needed for that. Rather than a new source package, I've been thinking about bundling ublock-origin-lite *with* debian's chromium package. That would get updated as often as chromium gets updated for all distributions (due to weekly security updates). Especially in light of LinkedIn scanning installed extensions to fingerprint people, it feels like a standard set of extensions should come preinstalled with browsers rather than training users to go install random extensions from what is essentially a browser "app" store. This also feels like something that the ungoogled-chromium folks should/could be doing, but I still need to look into feasibility. From dilinger at queued.net Fri Apr 3 19:18:38 2026 From: dilinger at queued.net (Andres Salomon) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2026 14:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#1102005: webext-ublock-origin-chromium: No longer supported by latest chromium :( In-Reply-To: <52402da1f0f8c58365972b1b3199e7d39871e1a5.camel@debian.org> References: <52402da1f0f8c58365972b1b3199e7d39871e1a5.camel@debian.org> <52402da1f0f8c58365972b1b3199e7d39871e1a5.camel@debian.org> Message-ID: <75f411ce-4506-4784-817c-ee6980d282ba@queued.net> On Sun, 02 Nov 2025 17:46:42 +0100 Markus Koschany wrote: > Control: severity -1 important > > I'm using the same Chromium version on bookworm and for me the workaround still > works. I haven't looked into ubo-lite yet but it appears to be the only > supported version for the long-run, with less functionality though. Not sure if > it makes sense to include it in ublock-origin or if a new source package is > needed for that. Rather than a new source package, I've been thinking about bundling ublock-origin-lite *with* debian's chromium package. That would get updated as often as chromium gets updated for all distributions (due to weekly security updates). Especially in light of LinkedIn scanning installed extensions to fingerprint people, it feels like a standard set of extensions should come preinstalled with browsers rather than training users to go install random extensions from what is essentially a browser "app" store. This also feels like something that the ungoogled-chromium folks should/could be doing, but I still need to look into feasibility. From noreply at release.debian.org Mon Apr 13 05:39:23 2026 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing autoremoval watch) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 04:39:23 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] allow-html-temp is marked for autoremoval from testing Message-ID: allow-html-temp 10.1.1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2026-05-18 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1132626: rnp: rnp FTBFS with botan3/3.11.1 https://bugs.debian.org/1132626 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl From noreply at release.debian.org Mon Apr 13 05:39:23 2026 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing autoremoval watch) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 04:39:23 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] mailmindr is marked for autoremoval from testing Message-ID: mailmindr 1.7.1-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2026-05-18 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1132626: rnp: rnp FTBFS with botan3/3.11.1 https://bugs.debian.org/1132626 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl From noreply at release.debian.org Mon Apr 13 05:39:23 2026 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing autoremoval watch) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 04:39:23 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] eas4tbsync is marked for autoremoval from testing Message-ID: eas4tbsync 4.17-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2026-05-18 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1132626: rnp: rnp FTBFS with botan3/3.11.1 https://bugs.debian.org/1132626 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl From noreply at release.debian.org Mon Apr 13 05:39:24 2026 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing autoremoval watch) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 04:39:24 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] tbsync is marked for autoremoval from testing Message-ID: tbsync 4.16-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2026-05-18 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1132626: rnp: rnp FTBFS with botan3/3.11.1 https://bugs.debian.org/1132626 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl From noreply at release.debian.org Mon Apr 13 05:39:24 2026 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing autoremoval watch) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 04:39:24 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] tb-goodies is marked for autoremoval from testing Message-ID: tb-goodies 1.0.1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2026-05-18 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1132626: rnp: rnp FTBFS with botan3/3.11.1 https://bugs.debian.org/1132626 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl From noreply at release.debian.org Mon Apr 13 05:39:24 2026 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing autoremoval watch) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 04:39:24 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] quicktext is marked for autoremoval from testing Message-ID: quicktext 6.4.6-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2026-05-18 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1132626: rnp: rnp FTBFS with botan3/3.11.1 https://bugs.debian.org/1132626 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl From noreply at release.debian.org Mon Apr 13 05:39:24 2026 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing autoremoval watch) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 04:39:24 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] xnote is marked for autoremoval from testing Message-ID: xnote 4.6.51-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2026-05-18 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1132626: rnp: rnp FTBFS with botan3/3.11.1 https://bugs.debian.org/1132626 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl From noreply at release.debian.org Fri Apr 17 05:39:07 2026 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 04:39:07 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] debianbuttons REMOVED from testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the debianbuttons source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.3-2 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: # 1127569 in firefox-esr The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals. -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From noreply at release.debian.org Sat Apr 18 05:39:07 2026 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2026 04:39:07 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] debianbuttons 2.3-2 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the debianbuttons source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 2.3-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From noreply at release.debian.org Sun Apr 19 05:39:11 2026 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing autoremoval watch) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2026 04:39:11 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] debianbuttons is marked for autoremoval from testing Message-ID: debianbuttons 2.3-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2026-05-17 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1127569: firefox-esr: should support/recommend libavcodec62 (for libvpx consistency, and libavcodec61 is no longer built) https://bugs.debian.org/1127569 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Autoremoval data is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl From onders.am.istiets at gmail.com Thu Apr 23 08:51:28 2026 From: onders.am.istiets at gmail.com (onders) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 09:51:28 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#1134693: control Homepage seems not existent Message-ID: Source: lightbeam Severity: wishlist current seems not to exist https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/lightbeam-3-0 wayback https://web.archive.org/web/20210419013754/https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/lightbeam-3-0 as in watchfile and metadata this seems a valid replacement: https://github.com/princiya/lightbeam-we although this https://github.com/princiya/lightbeam-we/issues/7 eventualy leads to https://lightbeam.chikl.de/