libquicktime... finally(?)
Loïc Minier
lool at dooz.org
Thu Jul 19 08:41:45 UTC 2007
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> OK. Could this be done by adding [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !
> kfreebsd-i386] to the deps of libquicktime-dev (as in the build-deps)
> instead of variable substitution?
Unfortunately, this isn't supported (yet).
> > - check whether the libquicktime-dev deps are correct (they are empty
> > right now, this might not be correct) or fix them
> Hehe, is there another way than trial-and-error to find this out...?
You can grep for public #include on other libs and for Requires in the
.pc files (if any); if the library has a "-config" utility, you can
check what link flags it pulls (if it forces linking against -lfoo, you
should depend on libfoo-dev).
> > Hmm not sure what to do about this: did all applications build against
> > the experimental versions which did not have this header?
>
> Well, that's also tricky. All the packages I tried to build did succeed
> (e.g. transcode). I asked the maintainers of all the rdepending packages
> to test-build their applications against the packages in experimental,
> but you cannot be sure that everyone actually followed this advise...
So if they supposedly built without the private header and it's not
installed by upstream, I would go without it for now and report this
upstream.
--
Loïc Minier
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers
mailing list