Bug#509579: Acknowledgement (jack-audio-connection-kit: does not build netjack backend)
Free Ekanayaka
freee at debian.org
Sun Jan 11 10:56:02 UTC 2009
Hi Robert,
|--==> On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 21:48:09 +0000, bobob sbbod <rararararara at hotmail.co.uk> said:
bs> Dear Package Maintainer:
bs> I am glad to see netjack included now in the updated jackd package.
bs> However the current version 0.116.1-2 does not actually build with CELT support. This is because the CELT version in
bs> Debian (Lenny) is not as new as that required by NetJack, as seen in the ./configure output in a pbuilder.
bs> I am not sure what should be done about this as it depends on the plans to update the CELT library. Clearly, requiring
bs> a strict dependency would not be helpful as it would
bs> prevent the whole package from building instead of just losing CELT support.
bs> So, I hope you keep this in mind as the project continues! Having the newer CELT support for this purpose would be handy and mean
bs> I would not have to build my own JACK package ... because unfortuately, doing so is fraught with peril as the Debian dependencies must be addressed ..
Yes, I knew it was failing, but thought to add the build-dep anyway,
waiting for the new libcelt. Please just drop me a line when newer
celt is in sid.
Ciao!
Free
bs> configure:23995: checking for CELT
bs> configure:24003: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "celt >= 0.5.0"
bs> Requested 'celt >= 0.5.0' but version of celt is 0.4.0
bs> configure:24006: $? = 1
bs> configure:24021: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "celt >= 0.5.0"
bs> Requested 'celt >= 0.5.0' but version of celt is 0.4.0
bs> configure:24024: $? = 1
bs> Requested 'celt >= 0.5.0' but version of celt is 0.4.0
bs> configure:24052: result: no
bs> configure:24070: result: no
bs> configure:24072: WARNING: *** NetJack will not be built with celt support
bs> 509579 at bugs.debian.org
>>From: owner at bugs.debian.org
>>To: rararararara at hotmail.co.uk
>>Subject: Bug#509579: Acknowledgement (jack-audio-connection-kit: does not build netjack backend)
>>Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 12:54:03 +0000
>>
>>
>>Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
>>
>>This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
>>has been received.
>>
>>Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
>>interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
>>
>>As you requested using X-Debbugs-CC, your message was also forwarded to
>>rararararara at hotmail.co.uk
>>(after having been given a Bug report number, if it did not have one).
>>
>>Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
>>Debian Multimedia Team <debian-multimedia at lists.debian.org>
>>
>>If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
>>send it to 509579 at bugs.debian.org, as before.
>>
>>Please do not send mail to owner at bugs.debian.org unless you wish
>>to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.
>>
>>
>>--
>>509579: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=509579
>>Debian Bug Tracking System
>>Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
bs> _________________________________________________________________
bs> Cut through the jargon: find a PC for your needs.
bs> http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/130777504/direct/01/_______________________________________________
bs> pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
bs> pkg-multimedia-maintainers at lists.alioth.debian.org
bs> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers
mailing list