jack for lenny

Reinhard Tartler siretart at tauware.de
Mon Jan 12 09:27:43 UTC 2009


Free Ekanayaka <freee at debian.org> writes:

> I exchanged a few mails with some members of the release team, but
> didn't get a reply yet to my last one, in which I quote the sentence
> above. They are concerned that the new jackd version can possibly
> break other packages, but I'm pretty sure it won't, because both the
> API and the ABI haven't changed since a long time now, and according
> to mine and other people's tests the newer jackd works much better
> than the buggy one in lenny.

Ah I found the mail.

Well, from what I see from the package, it seems that the API (and
therefore the ABI) did change (at least in a backwards compatible way),
else you wouldn't have to bump SHLIBS, no? If there was really no ABI
change, we could revert the shlibs file and use packages built against
the new version of jack with the version in lenny. Which would help
quite a lot of package (84 packages in total).

Anyways, I've sent a follow-up mail to debian-release, let's see if and
how they respond.

-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4



More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list