[SCM] faad2 packaging branch, master, updated. upstream/2.7-44-g1ca1696

[Felipe Sateler]

(sorry for mailing privately, I really need to check who I'm sending the 
messages too :/)

El miércoles 3 de junio, Fabian Greffrath escribió:
> Felipe Sateler schrieb:
> > No, of course. If upstream doesn't pass -fPIC when building shared
> > objects, that is a bug in upstreams makefile/autofoo.
>
> That buildsystem would be broken in a spectacular way.

Agreed. I think it wouldn't even build (gcc/ld would fail).

>
> > I don't think this is the case for faad, though.
>
> It isn't. ;)

phew :)

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20090603/be3d66ff/attachment.pgp>