[SCM] rumor packaging branch, master, updated. debian/1.0.3b-1-6-g61cce45

[Felipe Sateler]

El miércoles 3 de junio, Reinhard Tartler escribió:
> Felipe Sateler <fsateler at gmail.com> writes:
> > Out of curiosity, why do you explicitly define upstream-tag and
> > debian-tag to the defaults?
>
> Mostly for clarity, and because other packages already do so. Moreover,
> a developer could have setup other defaults in his home, this config
> file brings things back to the way we expect this package to be handled.
>
> If we don't wish to have the config files like this, I'd suggest
> documenting this on the wiki package and let's implement that for all
> packages we maintain.
>
> FWIW, I don't have a strong opinion here.

I don't think it matters.. at least it doesn't hurt, even if it doesn't add 
anything for the common case. I wonder if there are people actually redefining 
them on their home config (I can perfectly see people that track upstream git 
modifying it in debian/gdb.conf, but not globally).


Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20090603/8bb20de4/attachment.pgp>