Bug#556392: jackeq does not start

[Daniel Vidal]

Hi

    You are rigth Adrian... I'am making 2.0 Version of Musix distro... and i
are using jackd from squeeze...

Best regards

2009/11/17 Adrian Knoth <adi at drcomp.erfurt.thur.de>

> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:07:25PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
> >> The generic fix is to recompile jackeq against new jackd package. Since
> >> we know the entire set of jackified apps, I see no point in
> >> reintroducing this 0.100.0 thing, it would bite us in jackd2 again.
> > (Is jack2 API and ABI compatible with jack1?)
>
> Yes, it's a drop-in replacement, and users can decide whether they want
> to use jack1 or jack2. They also keep the command line syntax in sync.
>
> >> For keeping our packages simple and clean, I suggest to recompile.
> > True. But I think the transition has been less smooth than it could have
> > been (my bad, I didn't think there were apps that old, apparently). The
>
> I still wonder how this bug got triggered. We already had a binNMU for
> jackeq, but the poster is using the old one (probably linked against
> libjackd-0.100). (the lenny version).
>
> The jackd version in lenny is 0.109, so we must be talking about some
> mixed system configuration, that is, a jackd version from
> unstable/testing and jackeq from lenny. (Daniel, please clarify)
>
> With jackeq from unstable/testing, there's no bug. With jackd from
> lenny, there's no bug.
>
>
> You also had the compat symlinks for a while:
>
>
> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/jack-audio-connection-kit.git;a=commitdiff;h=a90b2dada36e66e3faf2dcfc769a8ff0967f01a0
>
>
> Though it's not that hard to re-enable these two lines, I think we made
> everything right. I don't think we support mixed lenny/testing
> environments, we focus on squeeze. And for squeeze, we're done. ;)
>
> (I see this all the time: Ubuntu-8.04 too old for FFADO, too old for
> modern ardour, the new jackd requires celt-0.7.0 which got added to
> unstable last week... the whole pro-audio stuff is bleeding edge. It
> just doesn't make sense to run lenny with some parts from unstable.)
>
>
> > thing is that now a mixed upgrade of jack and friends can leave
> > applications in a broken state.
>
> If you think we should support this scenario, I'd second your proposal
> of re-adding the 0.100 compat link.
>
>
>
> Cheerio
>
> --
> mail: adi at thur.de       http://adi.thur.de      PGP/GPG: key via keyserver
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20091117/c2365fdf/attachment.htm>