Re: Orphaned packages

Jaromír Mikeš mira.mikes at
Sat Sep 26 10:20:50 UTC 2009

> Od: Felipe Sateler <fsateler at>

JM> > Hi,

JM> > Alessio - snd
JM> > Adrian - qjackctl

JM> > That's great.

JM> > ladcca is predecessor of lash , not sure if this is still needed.

JM> > I was checking lash it build here in pbuilder, but it has strange
JM> > packaging style.
JM> > I need advice here:
JM> > Extracted orig tarball create dir lash-0.5.4 in this dir is
JM> > lash-0.5.4.tar.gz and lash-0.5.4.tar.gz.cdbs-config_list file.

JM> > Is this normal or it should be reworked before uploading to debian
JM> > multimedia maintainers git?

FS> I think you should rework it. The tarball-in-tarball approach doesn't
FS> really work well with out git workflow IMO.

Ok I reworked it. Now going adopt and upload to git.
Package is not lintian clean.
All other changes will be commited  to make changelog easier later.


More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list