JACK2 package naming convention
freee at debian.org
Mon Sep 28 19:15:24 UTC 2009
|--==> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:11:35 +0200, adi at drcomp.erfurt.thur.de (Adrian Knoth) said:
AK> I don't have any experience with this kind of constructs. Question is:
AK> do we want to provide both jackd versions or can we live pretty well
AK> with only one?
AK> If upstream says jackd2 is ready to be used as a snap-in replacement for
AK> jack1, we'd simply go for jackd2 and omit virtual packages.
I would also avoid having two packages unless absolutely necessary. If
we want to start working on jack2, while letting users stick to jack1
till everything is really polished, I suggest uploading jack2 to
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers