packaging jack - details on "plan B"

[Jonas Smedegaard]

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 07:35:28AM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:55:20AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

>> If I get no response on this by sunday, and noone else objects, I 
>> will go ahead with my proposed plan.

>I've tried to follow this as closely as I can, but I am new to 
>packaging so not qualified to discuss the specifics.
>
>However, from what I do understand I do not see a consensus, yet. Also, 
>I would ask that we restate and clarify the proposed scheme and give 
>upstream a chance to comment.
>
>NB: though torben is truly awesome, he is not the only upstream 
>developer.

Thanks for the response.  I shall not touch the libjack packaging (even 
step one that I find glaring and obvious) until others have explicitly 
requested so and not been disputed by others on this list.


  - Jonas

-- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20100423/11e5ffa4/attachment.pgp>