packaging jack - details on "plan B"

Jonas Smedegaard jonas at jones.dk
Sat Apr 24 07:22:20 UTC 2010


On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 02:18:16AM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 05:52:35PM -0500, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
>
>>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 02:32:45PM -0500, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
>>>> [1] http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/SuggestedPackagingApproach
>>>
>>> Note that this is a wiki and the suggestions come from only one 
>>> person.
>>
>> True, but Nedko (the author of the article) shouldn't be ignored.  He 
>> is very knowledgeable and respected in the LAD/Jack communities.
>>
>> Furthermore, he is saying the exact same thing that Torben and I have 
>> been saying.
>
>I mostly agree with the suggested packaging except "jackd", "jackdbus" 
>and "jack server library" being separate packages.
>
>Not that it'd be wrong, but the amount of packages seems unnecessarily 
>high. There are even people who suggest to put everything in a single 
>jackd1/jackd2 package, but we probably don't want to go this far.

I actually am positive about separateing into more packages like that.  
But let's discuss that later, after switch to jackd2 is in place.

I.e. please remind me if I forget myself to get back to this issue :-)


Kind regards,

  - Jonas

-- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20100424/12c39231/attachment.pgp>


More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list