jackd repo merged

[Jonas Smedegaard]

Hi Adrian,

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 04:18:54PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:

>It looks like the branches in our jackd repo have been merged. Was this 
>intended?

Yes, it was intended.

Once upon a time (some weeks ago) we decided to switch from jackd1 to 
jackd2, without looking back, i.e. treating jackd2 as the successor of 
jackd1 replacing it completely.

Back then I merged the git.

Later we discussed again, and decided (mainly on your recommendation) to 
_first_ switch jackd1 to jackd2 and then maybe later add jackd1 back 
again as an optional alternative, keeping jackd2 as the default main 
implementation of JACK.


>I had jackd1 in master/upstream and jackd2 in 
>master.jackd2/upstream.jackd2. Given that we want to re-introduce 
>jackd1, it might be a good idea to fix this (if possible). OTOH, we 
>could create a dedicated jackd1 repo later, too.

It is easy to spawn a dedicated jackd1 branch later.

It is also easy to throw away my latest work done after the merge.  I 
would not like that, though.  It seems to me that it makes best sense 
for the git to reflect our packaging: default JACK is now jackd2.


  - Jonas

-- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20100429/f1ae4969/attachment.pgp>