cdbs vs dh

[Felipe Sateler]

On 13/08/10 09:10, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> What obviously helps is documentation.  I never used documentation
> myself for CDBS, just looked at the snippets, and I agree they may look
> scary to someone not intimate in make (similar to autotools being
> disliked by many).

Is there a doxygen-like tool for make? I think it could then be used to
generate reference docs from the sources (which is always easier than
keeping separate documentation).

(I'm thinking this subthread should go to another list...)
-- 
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler