[SCM] pd-pmpd packaging branch, master, updated. upstream/0.9-4-g86cd593

[Reinhard Tartler]

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 00:22:50 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

> On Aug 22, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 08:18:24PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> On 21/08/10 18:00, eighthave-guest at users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
>>>> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
>>>> commit b50fc79d8a856062d9a05100dd83a7fca3bf696b
>>>> Author: Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at eds.org>
>>>> Date:   Sat Aug 21 17:43:50 2010 -0400
>>>>
>>>>    added gitignore for clean git-status
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..3c2f99e
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/.gitignore
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
>>>> +debian/files
>>>> +debian/pd-pmpd.debhelper.log
>>>> +debian/pd-pmpd.substvars
>>>> +debian/pd-pmpd/
>>>> +*.o
>>>> +*.pd_linux
>>>> +.pc
>>>
>>> I can't think of any reason not to do this... but we don't seem to
>>> have this in any of our other packages (or at least, most). Any
>>> reason why we haven't done this before?
>>
>> I dislike silencing cruft, as in my packaging development routines
>> cruft is a sign of something potentially forgotten or gone wrong:
>>
>> A normal packaging build and successive cleanup should leave no traces
>> behind[1].
>
>
> Sounds reasonable.  I don't have a strong opinion, so I am happy to
> remove the .gitignore if you think I should.

I think ignoring the .pc directory is okay. We also (have to) tolerate
the existance of .git after all.

-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4