[SCM] ghostess packaging branch, master, updated. debian/20100326-1-19-g952e4b5

[Jonas Smedegaard]

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:03:22AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>On 26/08/10 07:49, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:16:32AM +0000,
>> rosea-guest at users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
>>>    changed in build-depends libjack-dev to libjack-dev |
>>> libjack-jackd2-dev, assuming this is the right and new approach to
>>> handle jack1 and jack2 in debian
>>
>>> - libjack-dev (>= 0.105),
>>> + libjack-dev | libjack-jackd2-dev,
>>
>>
>> No.  Above means "one of these two *specific* implementations are 
>> required".
>>
>> When you mean "any implementation is required", then instead use 
>> this:
>>
>>   libjack-dev | libjack0.100.0-dev
>>
>
>No. Your solution means either libjack-dev or a virtual package we are 
>trying to phase out (libjack0.100.0-dev).
>
>We really need to sort this out, but for now packages should just 
>build-depend on libjack-dev.

Ok.  My main point still stands :-)

Sorry for the confusion.


  - Jonas

-- 
  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20100826/bafc90ef/attachment.pgp>