foo-yc20 released

[Jonas Smedegaard]

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 07:26:50PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:28:17PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> If any other files (which are used for the resulting binaries) is 
>> GPL-2 (i.e. without permitting later revisions), then they are 
>> incompatible.
>
>For my packaging stuff I usually use the same license as the upstream 
>sources (just like an "extension" of the software itself), and so I've 
>done in this case (since foo-yc20 is GPL-3+).
>
>> Also, it limits the ability to reuse across packages, due to same 
>> kind of limitations.
>
>That's a good point, but I've always seen the Debian part of a package 
>tightly related to the software it referes to and so much difficult to 
>reuse anyway. But I lack in experience, and probably in this I'm wrong.

This is not a competition - it is not about "right" and "wrong", but 
about comparing styles of packaging patterns and inspire each other and 
maybe improve and mature. :-)


  - Jonas

-- 
  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20101210/6feeaf0e/attachment.pgp>