adding a binary package to pd-cyclone
Jonas Smedegaard
dr at jones.dk
Wed Dec 29 23:53:45 UTC 2010
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:14:57PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>You edited debian/control, but Jonas added debian/control.in for
>build-dependencies autogeneration. If you disagree about the use of
>debian/control.in, we should disable it. If not, we should use it. But
>having it and not using it does not seem a sane option.
I suggest we only drop the control.in if noone use the .in file or it
annoys someone.
I see no big problem in some of us editing the control file directly -
the nuissence of sync'ing changes there to the .in file is shadowed by
the benefit of dependency semi-autoresolving IMO.
(please do edit the .in file rather than the control file if you want to
help minimize work for everyone, though)
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20101230/85292a35/attachment-0001.pgp>
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers
mailing list