jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5-1_i386.changes REJECTED

[Reinhard Tartler]

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:28:42 (CET), Free Ekanayaka wrote:

>   RT> there is currently a vote on this ongoing right now...
>
> I'm sorry, I think I missed it, can you point me to it?


hm. it seems the message at
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2010-March/008415.html
is archived defectively. In that mail, I wrote this:


,----
| From this discussion, I gather the following options:
| 
|  A) stick with jack1
|  B) have jack2 in squeeze
|  C) have both jack1&jack2 in squeeze
|  F) further discussion
| 
| With such an fictional ballot, I'd vote:
| 
| A>B>F>C
| 
| 
| If you care to comment on this issue, please participate in the vote, so
| that we can assemble a report for the release team quickly.
`----

So far, only fabian as replied:

,----
| Am 18.03.2010 15:35, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
| > If you care to comment on this issue, please participate in the vote, so
| > that we can assemble a report for the release team quickly.
| 
| I am indifferent between A and B, just because I am lacking knowledge 
| about jack internals. But either of both is IMHO better than 
| maintaining both packages, which will require a lot of new 
| infrastructure and redundant work and further discussion only slows 
| things down even more. So my vote is:
| 
| (A<>B)>C>F
| 
| My vote should not be decisive for the choice between jack1 and jack2.
`----


-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4