[SCM] libinstpatch/master: dh-autoreconf is enough

[Jonas Smedegaard]

On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 10:36:54AM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:51:11AM +0000, 
>> alessio at users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
>>>   dh-autoreconf is enough
>>
>> Enough what? Lines consumed in the rules file?!?
>>
>> Replacing CDBS with short-form dh is a change of packaging style.
>>
>
>It was the original intention of Jaromír.
>
>Jaromír, isn'it?

Ah, ok.

I am not arguing against ditching CDBS here (although I am of course sad 
every time I see it happen), just the notion of dh being "enough" 
compared to CDBS.

So no need to prove to me the sanity of the change.  I guess I 
understand now what lies beneath that phrase of yours.


Regards,

  - Jonas

-- 
  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20101101/1c34d5df/attachment.pgp>