Comments regarding pd-arraysize_0.1-1_amd64.changes

[Felipe Sateler]

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 20:10, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:
> On 2010-11-04 22:51, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>>> Yeah, it is annoying for sure.  The problem is that this particular object
>>> is widely used and has been distributed and used like this since 2003ish.
>>
>> Can't it be distributed within puredata itself?
>
> hmm, i'd rather have the "puredata" package follow the upstream package
>  "pd" as closely as possible, without adding objects.
> so people using "pd-vanilla" (that is: upstream pd without any
> additional libraries), are 100% compatible with people using only
> debian's "puredata" package.

Of course. I meant including it upstream.

-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler