Thoughts on pd object packaging - use of cdbs might be preferable?

[Felipe Sateler]

Given that most pd libraries use the same template, I think we can
leverage the use of cdbs here:

1. We ship (eg, in puredata-dev) a standard-pd-object.mk CDBS class
which includes the snippets needed for the shlibdeps and license
fiddling, and the makefile class.
2. rules files then become simply:

#!/usr/bin/make -f

LIBRARY_NAME = pdlib

include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/standard-pd-object.mk



What do you think?
-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler