lame in new queue

[Fabian Greffrath]

Am 12.11.2010 08:09, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
> I'd suggest to wait for lame to be ACCEPTED or REJECTED. ftp-master
> seems to consider it unredistributable licensewise. Or port the pd-libs

Is this because of the two extra clauses that Andres mentioned? IMHO 
they do only add more freedom (clause 1) and ensure that LAME is not 
used to enforce patents (clause 2).

> to libavcodec and hope that someone finally finishes Michael's mp3
> encoder.

Yes, but LAMe is still *the* OSS MP3 encoder. For example, I remember 
that libavcodec implementations of AAC encoding and decoding suffered 
from regressions if compared to FAAC/FAAD2.