Thoughts on pd object packaging - use of cdbs might be preferable?

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

On Nov 12, 2010, at 4:43 AM, IOhannes zmölnig wrote:

> On 11/11/2010 08:30 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to have my packages work on all Debian platforms, but I have
>> never worked with hurd or kfreebsd, nor have had any feedback that  
>> there
>> are problems.  As far as I can tell, my packages build on all Debian
>> platforms.
>
> just call the build-logs for any of those packages. e.g.
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pd-motex
>
> but this was just meant as an example for the added benefit of using a
> common cdbs/dh/.. snippet.


Ah yes, still learning my way around all the Debian tools, they are  
pretty large.  A common snippet would be great, no argument here.

About the HURD/kFreeBSD issue, it seems to be a linking issue, do we  
have to handle the linking differently with those kernels?  I guess  
the Makefile is lacking uname detection for those kernels, since its  
looking for 'Linux'.  Hopefully just using the same settings for the  
other two kernels will work.

.hc


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

"We have nothing to fear from love and commitment." - New York Senator  
Diane Savino, trying to convince the NY Senate to pass a gay marriage  
bill