requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee

[Felipe Sateler]

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at> wrote:
>
> On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version of
>>>> the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia.  It
>>>> is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of other
>>>> ITP'ed packages depend on it.
>>>>
>>>> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese
>>> person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you
>>> please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some
>>> input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph.
>>
>>
>> Yeah, the license is a bit weird, I don't know what its "officially"
>> called, but it is the same text as the [incr Tcl] license, which is included
>> in Debian:
>>
>>
>> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/itcl3/itcl3_3.4~b1-2/itcl3.copyright
>>
>> The only difference is that the GOVERNMENT USE section is more verbose in
>> the itcl license, but they reference the same regulation numbers.
>
>
> It seems to be the Tcl/Tk license:
>
> http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/license.html

Indeed. Please add the pristine-tar data to the repository, so I can
generate the appropriate tarball.

-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler