Bug#597119: unblock: libffado/2.0.1+svn1856-2
Adrian Knoth
adi at drcomp.erfurt.thur.de
Sun Sep 26 18:06:26 UTC 2010
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 12:29:56PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > >From the changelog:
> > >
> > > * Compile with -fPIC.
> > > * Refactor common python code into ffado-python-support
> > > (Closes: #594568) (LP: #524702 #624514)
> >
> > It looks like the upload of -2 earlier today was rejected due to
> > including an .orig.tar.gz, which did not match the file already in the
> > archive.
> >
> > Please let us know once the package has been re-uploaded and accepted.
>
> It looks like it has now. Given that we're in freeze, would it not have
> been easier just to move the python modules in to -tools and have
> -mixer-qt4 depend on that, or something similar, rather than adding a
> new package?
I like this idea, and I don't see why we shouldn't do it this way.
Should we go for it? If so, I'd prepare a new upload.
Thanks for the hint.
--
mail: adi at thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP/GPG: key via keyserver
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers
mailing list