lame_3.98.4-1_i386.changes REJECTED

[Sebastian Dröge]

On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 18:56 +0000, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Hi maintainer,
> 
> the package fails to comply with the LGPL. Quoting from the top level README:
> 
>   (LGPL, see www.gnu.org) with the following modification:
>   ...
>   2. You agree not to enforce any patent claims for any aspect of
>      MPEG audio compression, or any other techniques contained in
>      the LAME source code.
> 
> But the LPGL is clear:
> 
>   You may not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the
>   rights granted herein.

What exactly is wrong with this? Sure, it's not LGPL anymore and not
even LGPL compatible but by itself it should be a valid license.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20110419/45357ed6/attachment-0001.pgp>