please upload: pd-pdogg

[IOhannes m zmölnig]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/25/2011 06:13 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> I'd like to keep the short-form dh packages 

i think everybody now agrees that what we are discussing should be
irrelevant of whether a specific package uses dh or cdbs or whatever.

> that I've done as they are,

rather not, as some of those packages have an RC-bug filed (FTBFS), so
we should fix that.

> using this same Makefile. I've spent a lot of time building up a whole

unfortunately the upstream Makefile of the said packages is broken.
since the upstream Makefile is essentially the same for all (your)
packages (though their are different generations, with recent enough
upstream Makefiles not exposing the problem) it would make sense to
further centralize this Makefile, so any problem could be fixed by
fixing this Makefile, rather than fixing 10 identical ones.

it would be good to find a workflow that fits both your needs and allows
for easy fixes of 'important' bugs.

mfgsadr
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk213R8ACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvThBACg2W8OWZAnO1FUhoLABAqsEKnm
qIoAoLkra5eN4+hQgwuVqJpZnWsuIiNh
=GmEY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----