Libsoundtouch{0,1}-dev?

David Henningsson david.henningsson at canonical.com
Thu Feb 3 11:42:48 UTC 2011


On 2011-02-02 22:35, Miguel Colon wrote:
>> So looks like a "transition" to me, and we probably need to readjust
>> ardour's build dependency (to libsoundtouch-dev). I can take care of
>> this if agreed upon.
>
> Hello, yes it's a transition I was the one that made renamed it.
>
>> Perhaps Alessio wants to provide further clarification.
>
> Last time I spoke with Alessio about it from what I understood and
> remember he was waiting for post-squeeze. But better to wait for an
> official response since I might have misunderstood.
>
>>> Ardour (perhaps among others) build-depends on libsoundtouch1-dev, but
>>> this is not built by the archive as soundtouch provides
>>> libsoundtouch-dev but not libsoundtouch1-dev. Is this just a typo in
>>> soundtouch packaging, or do we have a more serious problem?
>
> The source packages affected are:
> Package: ardour
> Package: audacity
> Package: djplay
> Package: freecycle
> Package: gst-plugins-bad0.10
> Package: ihu
> Package: ocaml-soundtouch
> Package: rezound
> Package: yatm
>
> In addition:
> - liquidsoap just needs to be rebuilt whenever ocaml-soundtouch get
> updated since it depends on libsoundtouch-ocaml-dev and not
> libsoundtouch directly.
> - mixx just needs to be rebuilt since it depends on libsoundtouch-dev
> so it should be fine after a binary upload or something.
>
> I basically got this information by adding sid/experimental source
> repos to the source.list and doing:
> grep-dctrl -FBuild-Depends libsoundtouch  -sPackage
> /var/lib/apt/lists/*Sources | sort | uniq
> and confirming with apt-cache rdepends (not sure if there was a better
> way or if doing it with these 2 commands is not exhaustive enough)
>
> I locally recompiled all the packages in a clean chroot when I made
> the initial rename and what I just posted are my notes from that time.
> Also, from what I wrote down, all packages except ocaml-soundtouch and
> liquidsoap worked with just renaming the build dependency but as luck
> would have it ardour is the only package that I forgot to document the
> changes I made to it so it would build.
>
> Finally I remember Alessio uploading a new version of audacity and
> freecycle to experimental using the renamed library so the transition
> on those 2 I assume is done or started.
>
> Hope I made some sense.

Yes, thanks. I just wanted to raise the issue. I looked at djplay and 
ihu - should I just file FTBFS bugs against them to tell the maintainer 
to change the build-depend? Unstable seems to be unchanged, there is 
nothing in experimental (as of packages.debian.org), and it's not under 
pkg-multimedia's umbrella.

-- 
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
http://launchpad.net/~diwic



More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list