ok to repackage jack-tools using CDBS / please release jack-tools
Arnout Engelen
arnouten at bzzt.net
Sat Jan 1 15:31:16 UTC 2011
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 04:19:07PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I would be happy to help maintain this - if ok with you to use CDBS.
>
> @Arnout: Would you mind me switching the packaging from short-form dh to
> CDBS?
Not at all
> If not, then please release it yourself - or if needed have someone with
> upload rights and happy about short-form dh help do it.
IIRC the main reason this was not yet uploaded is that the source files don't
have licensing information - the README specifies the license for the whole
package. While strictly spoken this might be legally sufficient, it's highly
recommended to have licensing information in the source files, to avoid any
confusion.
I submitted patches that add the licensing information to the source files
to upstream on various occasions. I always get a polite reply, but none of
them have been applied...
We probably should give up on that and move on. I think there are a couple of
commits upstream ( http://slavepianos.org/rd/r/d/darcsweb.cgi?r=jack.* ) that
haven't made it into our git yet.
Regards,
Arnout
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers
mailing list